<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Randomness &amp; Joe DiMaggio</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.goodevalue.com/2009/07/randomness-joe-dimaggio/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.goodevalue.com/2009/07/randomness-joe-dimaggio/</link>
	<description>It may be cheap, but is it a Goode value?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 22:06:46 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daniel M. Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.goodevalue.com/2009/07/randomness-joe-dimaggio/comment-page-1/#comment-1216</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel M. Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 03:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goodevalue.com/?p=467#comment-1216</guid>
		<description>If you don&#039;t mind me being persnickity about it, outcomes that are more disappointing than randon chance indicates deviate from randomness too. Behavioral finance owes a lot of its credibility to the fact that the typical mutual fund, even after transaction costs, tends to perform a little worse than random chance suggests.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you don&#8217;t mind me being persnickity about it, outcomes that are more disappointing than randon chance indicates deviate from randomness too. Behavioral finance owes a lot of its credibility to the fact that the typical mutual fund, even after transaction costs, tends to perform a little worse than random chance suggests.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yngvai</title>
		<link>http://www.goodevalue.com/2009/07/randomness-joe-dimaggio/comment-page-1/#comment-1215</link>
		<dc:creator>Yngvai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goodevalue.com/?p=467#comment-1215</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m reading &quot;Fooled by Randomness&quot; right now which is right along these lines.  Nassim Teleb talks about the &quot;alternative outcomes&quot; that you refer to here with the DiMaggio example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m reading &#8220;Fooled by Randomness&#8221; right now which is right along these lines.  Nassim Teleb talks about the &#8220;alternative outcomes&#8221; that you refer to here with the DiMaggio example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.285 seconds -->

