Comments on: Skins: Yet Another Silly Shoe Idea http://www.goodevalue.com/2007/11/skins-yet-another-silly-shoe-idea/ It may be cheap, but is it a Goode value? Sun, 16 Oct 2011 22:06:46 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8 hourly 1 By: The long-term outlook for every penny stock « Reaper Trades http://www.goodevalue.com/2007/11/skins-yet-another-silly-shoe-idea/comment-page-1/#comment-1339 The long-term outlook for every penny stock « Reaper Trades Mon, 05 Oct 2009 14:44:29 +0000 http://www.goodevalue.com/2007/11/22/skins-yet-another-silly-shoe-idea/#comment-1339 [...] demonstrated by Skinns, Inc. (SKNN) long-term chart. See my write up on Skins from two years ago on my GoodeValue [...] [...] demonstrated by Skinns, Inc. (SKNN) long-term chart. See my write up on Skins from two years ago on my GoodeValue [...]

]]> By: michael http://www.goodevalue.com/2007/11/skins-yet-another-silly-shoe-idea/comment-page-1/#comment-95 michael Tue, 27 Nov 2007 16:54:50 +0000 http://www.goodevalue.com/2007/11/22/skins-yet-another-silly-shoe-idea/#comment-95 My sister, who knows a lot more about shoes than I do, has looked at the shoes and found the concept wanting. Furthermore, everyone I know who owns a number of shoes and is willing to pay the prices Skins is asking owns myriad different brands. Is it worthwhile to go with a pair of Skins rather than a pair of another shoe? No--the only advantage to Skins is if the customer owns multiple pairs. And Skins has a limited number of outers available. The company would have to offer a truly huge variety of outers before it started to become worthwhile for consumers to go with them. Also, the company will not have more than a few outers at shoe outlets, which will mean that the average retail shopper will not see much of a reason to go with them. My sister, who knows a lot more about shoes than I do, has looked at the shoes and found the concept wanting. Furthermore, everyone I know who owns a number of shoes and is willing to pay the prices Skins is asking owns myriad different brands. Is it worthwhile to go with a pair of Skins rather than a pair of another shoe? No–the only advantage to Skins is if the customer owns multiple pairs. And Skins has a limited number of outers available. The company would have to offer a truly huge variety of outers before it started to become worthwhile for consumers to go with them. Also, the company will not have more than a few outers at shoe outlets, which will mean that the average retail shopper will not see much of a reason to go with them.

]]> By: Edmund Marinelli http://www.goodevalue.com/2007/11/skins-yet-another-silly-shoe-idea/comment-page-1/#comment-94 Edmund Marinelli Tue, 27 Nov 2007 15:46:11 +0000 http://www.goodevalue.com/2007/11/22/skins-yet-another-silly-shoe-idea/#comment-94 Have you tried the shoes? Have you seen them ? Have you read any comments by people that have tried and seen the shoes? I am NOT an investor in SKNN, but what bothers me is that there is no aspect of your criticism that addresses the product attributes at all or indicates any substantive knowledge of them. Now, whether someone should invest is another matter and I'm watching this but staying away because I want to see if this actually pans out. There will be plenty of time to make money in this if it can establish itself. But to call the shoes silly etc....with what appears to be no product knowledge or experience is unworthy of what otherwise is a rational approach to this as an equity. You should avoid the loss of credibility that comes with such an intellectual error. Have you tried the shoes? Have you seen them ? Have you read any comments by people that have tried and seen the shoes? I am NOT an investor in SKNN, but what bothers me is that there is no aspect of your criticism that addresses the product attributes at all or indicates any substantive knowledge of them. Now, whether someone should invest is another matter and I’m watching this but staying away because I want to see if this actually pans out. There will be plenty of time to make money in this if it can establish itself. But to call the shoes silly etc….with what appears to be no product knowledge or experience is unworthy of what otherwise is a rational approach to this as an equity. You should avoid the loss of credibility that comes with such an intellectual error.

]]> By: Tony Searight http://www.goodevalue.com/2007/11/skins-yet-another-silly-shoe-idea/comment-page-1/#comment-91 Tony Searight Fri, 23 Nov 2007 06:16:41 +0000 http://www.goodevalue.com/2007/11/22/skins-yet-another-silly-shoe-idea/#comment-91 I agree that the price of Skin Footwear will keep it likely not to go big. I, myself would sell 3 pair for 100.00 and would definitely target the teenage market. Tony Searight & Youth Investors and Givers A & P Searight Investment Group For Kids www.tonysearight.zoomshare.com I agree that the price of Skin Footwear will keep it likely not to go big. I, myself would sell 3 pair for 100.00 and would definitely target the teenage market.

Tony Searight & Youth Investors and Givers
A & P Searight Investment Group For Kids
http://www.tonysearight.zoomshare.com

]]>