Comments on: Can you trust the Stocklemon? Part 2 http://www.goodevalue.com/2007/08/can-you-trust-the-stocklemon-part-2/ It may be cheap, but is it a Goode value? Sun, 16 Oct 2011 22:06:46 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8 hourly 1 By: mik metzger http://www.goodevalue.com/2007/08/can-you-trust-the-stocklemon-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-15 mik metzger Mon, 06 Aug 2007 07:37:31 +0000 http://www.goodevalue.com/2007/08/03/can-you-trust-the-stocklemon-part-2/#comment-15 WITHIN THE LAST TWO MONTHS RECENT UNPRECENDENTED COURT RULINGS THAT POSE A LARGE THREAT TO PEOPLE LIKE ANDREW LEFT, HAVE COME ABOUT. one of the rulings is: "COURTS MAY NOW RULE AN EXPRESSION OF AN OPINION AS AN INSERTION OF OBJECTIVE FACT. THUS A FALSE STATEMENT OR FACT WHETHER EXPRESSLY STATED OR IMPLIED FROM AN EXPRESSION OF OPINION IS ACTIONABLE" -meaning that if I say that i think a company is commiting fraud, even if it is only my opininon- it can be ruled defamation, slander etc. In mr. left other court cases "expressed opinions or implications were not actionable-NOW they are. WITHIN THE LAST TWO MONTHS RECENT UNPRECENDENTED COURT RULINGS THAT POSE A LARGE THREAT TO PEOPLE LIKE ANDREW LEFT, HAVE COME ABOUT.

one of the rulings is:
“COURTS MAY NOW RULE AN EXPRESSION OF AN OPINION AS AN INSERTION OF OBJECTIVE FACT. THUS A FALSE STATEMENT OR FACT WHETHER EXPRESSLY STATED OR IMPLIED FROM AN EXPRESSION OF OPINION IS ACTIONABLE”
-meaning that if I say that i think a company is commiting fraud, even if it is only my opininon- it can be ruled defamation, slander etc.

In mr. left other court cases “expressed opinions or implications were not actionable-NOW they are.

]]>